nanog mailing list archives
RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: "Frank Bulk - iName.com" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:49:04 -0500
There's a big difference between signing that the books are right (it matters!) and filling out paperwork for ARIN. The first is one of his primary duties as an officer of the company, the second won't even make his secretary's "to do" list. It appears that ARIN wants to raise the IP addressing space issue to the CxO level -- if it was interested in honesty, ARIN would have required a notarized statement by the person submitting the request. If ARIN really wants to get the interest of CEOs, raise the price! Frank -----Original Message----- From: Jo Rhett [mailto:jrhett () netconsonance com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:25 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
So the "officer," most likely not being a technical person, is going to contact ... probably the same people who made the request, ask them if they need the space. Right? And why would the answer be any different, now?
This is exactly identical to having the CEO signed the quarterly statements. You are saying this is Right. The CEO couldn't do that accounting him/herself -- but they're going to ask more questions and be more cautious before putting their name on it. I applaud this idea. I wish we had done it 10 years ago, but it's not too late to start. Before late than never. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Brandon Galbraith (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests manolo (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Andersen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Shane Ronan (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Moyle-Croft (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Aaron Wendel (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 23)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Carl Ford (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Rich Kulawiec (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joel Jaeggli (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Leo Bicknell (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Graham (Apr 23)