nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:47:38 -0700
I don't believe I saw anywhere that these attestations were being made under penalty of perjury or any other method of civil punishment. Do they have to notarized?
What are the real benefits here, other then putting more people to work at ARIN and increase the workload of those who really do need new IP space.
Shane Ronan On Apr 20, 2009, at 7:04 PM, David Andersen wrote:
"Are you asking me to attest, publicly and perhaps legally, that this information is correct?
Current thread:
- Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Brandon Galbraith (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests manolo (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Andersen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Shane Ronan (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Moyle-Croft (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Aaron Wendel (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 23)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Carl Ford (Apr 20)