nanog mailing list archives
Re: IXP
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:10:41 +0200
On 18.04.2009 00:04 Paul Vixie wrote
the 300-peer IXP's i've been associated with weren't quite full mesh in terms of who actually wanted to peer with whom, so, no.Much depends on your definition of "quite". Would 30% qualify?30% would be an over-the-top success. has anybody ever run out of 1Q tags in an IXP context?
Why? You only need 1 ;-) Arnold -- Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany email: arnold () nipper de phone: +49 6224 9259 299 mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: IXP - PNI, (continued)
- Re: IXP - PNI bmanning (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP - PNI Antonio Querubin (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP - PNI Joe Greco (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP - PNI bmanning (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP - PNI Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nathan Ward (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nick Hilliard (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Jeff Young (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP vijay gill (Apr 19)
- Re: IXP Alan Hannan (Apr 19)
- RE: IXP Deepak Jain (Apr 20)