nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP - PNI


From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:52:53 -0500 (CDT)

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
the vlan tagging idea is a virtualization of the PNI construct.
why use an IX when running 10's/100's/1000's of private network
interconnects will do?

granted, if out of the 120 ASN's at an IX, 100 are exchanging on
average - 80KBs - then its likley safe to dump them all into a single
physical port and vlan tag the heck out of it.

its those other 20 that demand some special care.

The construct also doesn't scale well for multicast traffic exchange if 
there's a significant number of multicast peers even though the traffic 
might be low for individual source ASNs.  On the other hand, if the IXP 
doesn't use IGMP/MLD snooping capable switches, then I suppose it doesn't 
matter.

Didn't we go through all this with ATM VC's at the AADS NAP, etc?

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


Current thread: