nanog mailing list archives
Re: IXP
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:01:37 +0000
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:08:04 +0000 ... i should answer something said earlier: yes there's only 14 bits of tag and yes 2**14 is 4096. in the sparsest and most wasteful allocation scheme, tags would be assigned 7:7 so there'd be a max of 64 peers.
i meant of course 12 bits, that 2**12 is 4096, and 6:6. apologies for slop.
Current thread:
- Re: IXP - PNI, (continued)
- Re: IXP - PNI Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nathan Ward (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Nick Hilliard (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Jeff Young (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP vijay gill (Apr 19)
- Re: IXP Alan Hannan (Apr 19)
- RE: IXP Deepak Jain (Apr 20)
- RE: IXP Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Apr 20)
- RE: IXP Deepak Jain (Apr 20)
- RE: IXP Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Apr 20)
- Re: IXP Niels Bakker (Apr 20)