nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NANOG] OSPF minutia, and, technote publication venues


From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 13:28:49 -0400


On May 5, 2008, at 1:16 PM, David Andersen wrote:

On May 5, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:

But yes, Joe's ISC TechNote is an excellent document, and was a big
help
in figuring out how to set this up a few years ago.

and now for something completely different -- where in the
interpipes could
a document like that have been published, vs. ISC's web site?  the
amount
of red tape and delay involved in Usenix or IETF or IEEE or ACM are
vastly
more than most smart ops people are willing to put in.  where is the
light /
middle weight class, or is every organization or person who wants to
publish
this kind of thing going to continue to have the exclusive and bad
choice of
"blog it, or write an article for ;login:/ACM-Queue/Circle-ID, or
write an
academic paper and wait ten months"?  isn't this a job for... NANOG?

If you're asking seriously:  arXiv.org is a pretty reasonable
candidate for less-formal but more-public publication of things like
Joe's TechNote.

It's taken off seriously in physics, but  I don't know anyone who uses
it seriously for computer science stuff.


There are certain types of networking problems where arxiv gets decent  
traffic; I get about 1 paper
per day on networking and cryptography.

At any rate, I would encourage people to use it and this seems like a  
possible appropriate paper for it.

Regards
Marshall

 Probably because our
conferences have much faster turnaround than most discipline's
journals do.  But arXiv exists, it'll probably be around for a while,
and it provides a reasonable starting point for hosting and citing the
documents...

  -Dave


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


Current thread: