nanog mailing list archives
Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:09:54 -0400
Hi all,An acquaintance who runs an ISP with an M7i on its border is looking to upgrade, because the M7i is starting to creak from all the flesh- tone MPEGs his customers are sharing. (How times have changed. Back when I was chasing packets, it was flesh-tone JPEGs.)
He's looking at the MX480 and the E300.The MX480 is attractive because the M7i has been stable as a rock, and he's familiar with JUNOS.
The E300 is attractive because it's half the price of the MX480, and has the potential to hold layer-2 cards as well as layer-3 ports which makes the price per port much more reasonable than the MX480. But he has no experience with Force10 at any ISO layer higher than 2.
He doesn't have any exotic requirements beyond OSPF, OSPFv3, BGP, IP and IPv6. There's no MPLS in the picture, for example. However, he's going to want four or five full tables plus a moderate load of peering routes in there. And maybe VRRP.
Thoughts from people who have tried one or the other, or both? Or who have faced this kind of problem, and came up with a different answer?
Feel free to send mail off-list; I can summarise if there is interest. Joe
Current thread:
- Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Joe Abley (Jul 17)
- Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Chris Marlatt (Jul 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Keith O'neill (Jul 18)
- Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Chris Marlatt (Jul 18)
- Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Chris Heighway (Jul 18)
- Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Paul Stewart (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Chris Heighway (Jul 18)
- Message not available
- RE: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Paul Stewart (Jul 18)
- RE: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Eric Van Tol (Jul 18)
- RE: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Paul Stewart (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Doug McIntyre (Jul 20)
- Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480 Chris Marlatt (Jul 18)