nanog mailing list archives
Re: YouTube IP Hijacking
From: brett watson <brett () the-watsons org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:30:51 -0700
On Feb 26, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
The fact is that employment of explicit inter-domain prefix filtering seems to only be deteriorating from where it was 15 years ago is telling, and I think folks have become lazy and accepting, even as more and more critical infrastructure and services require an available and accurate routing system. IMO, the onus is on the operators to step up...
Darn well said (the whole post). Some of us *used* the available infrastructure almost to a fault about 15+ years ago (the early days of Sprint, MCI, ANSNet, etc) but it has slowly gone down hill since. It takes work to keep it all up to date but it appears that it would save a lot of pain (and very long threads on nanog) if we did.
I've never been able to figure out the incentive program to use it though. "Stopping the pain" doesn't seem to do it :) (I know, I know, it's all about the money).
-b
Current thread:
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking, (continued)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Arnd Vehling (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Randy Epstein (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Arnd Vehling (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jeroen Massar (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking michael.dillon (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Dave Pooser (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Dave Pooser (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Steve Gibbard (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Danny McPherson (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking brett watson (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Owen DeLong (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Rick Astley (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Leinen (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking sthaug (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)