nanog mailing list archives
Re: YouTube IP Hijacking
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:58:37 +0100
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:27:41AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il> wrote a message of 17 lines which said:
- Lack of clue - Couldn't care less - No revenue Take your pick - or add your own reason. PCCW is not alone. They just happen to be the latest in a long line of ISPs that follow the same rules - their own.
No, most operators do filter BGP announcements. I know it, because I have read it on Cnet: http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9878655-7.html
That's because Hong Kong-based PCCW, which provides the Internet link to Pakistan Telecom, did not stop the misleading broadcast--which is what most large providers in the United States and Europe do.
Current thread:
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking, (continued)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Randy Epstein (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Arnd Vehling (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jeroen Massar (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking michael.dillon (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Dave Pooser (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Dave Pooser (Feb 26)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Steve Gibbard (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Danny McPherson (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking brett watson (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Owen DeLong (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Rick Astley (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Leinen (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking sthaug (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Stewart (Feb 24)