![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime
From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:01:45 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Andre Gironda" <andre () operations net> wrote: [lots of good stuff elided]
It's our fault for not pushing AV on your customers, and it's the AV's fault for not providing audit data to us, and it's the software vendors' fault for causing us to have to recommend AV and for AV to exist. The liability should land on the software vendors.
AV is simply a tool, not a panacea. In fact, what to do about the hundreds of thousands of compromised websites/servers that help facilitate this crime? What about the thousands of malicious rogue DNS servers? There's enough problem-spaces to point fingers all around... $.02, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHshdFq1pz9mNUZTMRAhxjAJ9H8m2opz5e69X+GLhjtm50OUalyACgpRdd orMVvqPF/bdpdCV6nkn9/3g= =KwZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime, (continued)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Jim Popovitch (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime JC Dill (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Mark Radabaugh (Feb 13)
- RE: IBM report reviews Internet crime Frank Bulk (Feb 14)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Tony Finch (Feb 13)
- RE: IBM report reviews Internet crime michael.dillon (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime J. Oquendo (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime John Dupuy (Feb 13)