nanog mailing list archives

Re: Failover solution using BGP


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 02:48:32 +0800


On Dec 31, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:

DNS tweaks won't help with that (and to be honest, BGP doesn't address it, either).


After all, there ought to be an internal line of communication as well as the external one, and the availability probes can be set up with logic such that if one side has bidirectional comms and the other doesn't, the desired behavior (whatever that may be, dependent upon which side has full comms) can be enforced.

Couple that with a stateless front-end - which could also afford active/active in that tier, even if the back-end is monolithic - and it's more nearly a complete solution, with more options, granularity, and safeguards available, than one based upon routing alone.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile

     All behavior is economic in motivation and/or consequence.






Current thread: