nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover solution using BGP
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:36:16 +0100
* Roland Dobbins:
Have they considered doing GSLB via DNS rather than playing routing games? Seems as if it might answer better, be less complex, et. al.
I suspect they want to solve the split brain problem, which would explain the strong, non-negotiable requirement of traffic flow to only one site. DNS tweaks won't help with that (and to be honest, BGP doesn't address it, either).
Current thread:
- Re: Failover solution using BGP, (continued)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Doug Schaapveld (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chandler Bassett (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Malte von dem Hagen (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Austin Wilson (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP William Herrin (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Naveen Nathan (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Bryant Valencia (Dec 31)