nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 issues
From: marco <marco () zero11 com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:47:23 -0800
Steven King wrote:
We saw our bandwidth drop on our Level3 OC-48 to about half of what we were doing. We had to stop announcing our subnets to Level3 to get traffic to fail over properly throughout the world. We have a ticket open with Level3's NOC but have not received word on what happened or when to expect a resolution. Kevin Loch wrote:marco wrote:From what I heard, it was some some malfunction with a router inWashington D.C. which terminated a 100GB bundle from Paris. It was carring about 50GB at the time of the failure. Not sure why routes within the US would be effected.We connect to level3 in Ashburn/DC and saw traffic drop 50% in both directions on that port. Testing showed 100% loss on 50% of the flows. We shut that port down and now it won't come back up. I have link but no arp for their IP. This is a new link that was turned up in the past few weeks. - Kevin
http://www.internetpulse.net/Main.aspx shows that everything is back to normal.
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 issues, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 issues Paul (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jason Cheslock (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jon Wolberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Derek Bodner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Kevin Loch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Steven King (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues virendra rode (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Rich Kulawiec (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Alex H. Ryu (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jim Popovitch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Justin M. Streiner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Todd Vierling (Dec 29)