nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 issues
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:53:15 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:17, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch () cpgreeley com> wrote:It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major network issues today.Have you ever seen cleanup efforts after a major accident. Cleanup usually involves more backhoes, and other major equipment, than a normal well planned construction site.
True enough. In their haste to clean up from that derailment, it's possible that the backhoes severed the other side of that diverse (cough) optical ring, which was probably on the other side of the same set of railroad tracks, if not in the same conduit/bank as the cable that got hit :)
jms
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 issues, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 issues Kevin Loch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Steven King (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues virendra rode (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Rich Kulawiec (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Alex H. Ryu (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jim Popovitch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Justin M. Streiner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Todd Vierling (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 29)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- unsubscribe Springer, Dennis D (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe James Thomas (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Gary E. Miller (Dec 29)