Re: Level 3 issues

[marco <marco () zero11 com>]

Paul wrote:
> Same issue here from Chicago and Montreal. Seems anything routing
> through Washington.Level3 is going to null. The rest of the level3
> network seems to be ok.
> 6  ae-32-52.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.101.62)  0.976 ms  10.344
> ms  0.866 ms
> 7  ae-5.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.140.194)  1.245 ms  0.991 ms 
> 0.978 ms
> 8  ae-2-2.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.70)  18.608 ms  18.961
> ms  18.583 ms
> 9  * * *
> 10  * * *
> 11  * * *
> 12  * * *
> 13  * * *
> 14  * * *
> 15  * * *
> 16  * * *
>
> ...
> 4  car1.Montreal2.Level3.net (67.215.0.146)  0.657 ms  0.791 ms  0.699 ms
> 5  ae-5-5.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.141.6)  17.764 ms  8.490 ms 
> 18.197 ms
> 6  ae-94-94.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.126)  15.541 ms  8.286
> ms  17.098 ms
> 7  ae-93-93.ebr3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.109)  11.384 ms
> ae-61-61.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.65)  9.100 ms  8.614 ms
> 8  ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.93)  13.840 ms  15.584
> ms  17.443 ms
> 9  ae-94-94.csw4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.190)  23.420 ms 
> 25.569 ms  18.042 ms
> 10  ae-4-99.edge2.Washington4.Level3.net (4.68.17.211)  14.052 ms 
> 14.028 ms  13.610 ms
> 11  * * *
> 12  * * *
> 13  * * *
> 14  * * *
> 15  *
>
>
> Paul Stewart wrote:
> > Ahh.. yes seeing that now here from Toronto ON - didn't see this
> > issue when the original poster sent the first message... it's now
> > happening here too...
> >
> > Shutting down their session until something looks "better"
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pierre-Henri [mailto:phach34 () gmail com] Sent: December 28, 2008
> > 1:06 PM
> > To: marco
> > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > Subject: Re: Level 3 issues
> >
> > marco a écrit :
> >  
> > > is anyone having issues with Level3?
> > >
> > >       
> > hi,
> > theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have
> > not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about
> > 30 minutes.
> > Don't know if there is a link with your question, but it's strange...
> >
> >
> > Pierre-Henri
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > "The information transmitsted is intended only for the person or
> > entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or
> > privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact
> > the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including
> > all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same.
> > Thank you."
> >
> >
> >   
According to L3, this issue should be fixed and we should start seeing
the traffic normalizing.
Can anyone confirm?