nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:01:06 +0900
Until all transit networks are willing to strictly filter their downstreams (and themselves!), if there is any unused space (note I said "unused", not "unallocated"), the miscreants will use it.
serious curiosity: what is the proportion of bad stuff coming from unallocated space vs allocated space? real measurements, please. and are there longitudinal data on this? are the uw folk, gatech, vern, ... measuring? randy
Current thread:
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918", (continued)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" michael.dillon (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 12)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Thomas (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Evans (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore (Aug 06)