nanog mailing list archives
Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918"
From: Patrick Darden <darden () armc org>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:55:13 -0400
Hi Jay, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
You really think Michael is malicious in his intent? You've spent a whole lot of time paying now attention around here, haven't you?
I think Michael tends to get confrontational. As, apparently, do you. I'm on a lot of the same lists Michael is on. Have been since 1997. I have a lot of respect for him, with reservations gathered from experience. He is sharp, and he has a sharp tongue.
No, you are wrong. Your attempt to trivialize what I have to say by calling it cute only proves that you don't know what you are talking about. Bad logic, isn't it? Statement that you are wrong, then "proving it" with nonsense addressing someone's character without addressing the point....No, cute soundbites don't make you an expert. But in this case, Dillon's right, and you're wrong: your attempt to trivialize the specific issue on point (allocation within the 1918 space internal to a company network) by implying that the only reasons to do it the way he suggests amount to "leaving space for soda machines" only proves in public that you don't know what you're talking about.
Your mislabelling my tongue-in-cheek ongoing obsession with soda machines as Trivializing only proves you have no sense of humor. I remember when some kids at MIT first put their dorm's soda machine on the internet. Man that was cool. You could ping it and find out how many cokes were left, and their temperature....
As randy would put it, I encourage my competitors to hire you to architect their WANs.
Thank you. Your bile does you credit. --Patrick Darden
Current thread:
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918", (continued)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Joel Jaeggli (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Joel Jaeggli (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" michael.dillon (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 12)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Thomas (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Evans (Aug 06)