nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 03:49:39 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 30 May 2007, David W. Hankins wrote:
Maybe I'm getting old, but the idea of managing this configuration information in my routers sounds like a real chore compared to the old DHCP relayed central server model.
not 'old' just 'sane'. or 'taking the same crazypills chris is', your call.
Would there be interest on a DHCPv6 related presentation at NANOG?
it would be nice perhaps a lightning talk? :) It is interesting that v6 went from 'eh, yea that's nice' to "holy crap, maybe I should figure this out?" in 4 months though...
Current thread:
- Re: Content provider plans, (continued)
- Re: Content provider plans Michal Krsek (May 30)
- Re: Content provider plans Sean Donelan (May 30)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Adrian Chadd (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 30)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 26)