nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:43:39 -0400
On 5/26/07, Steven M. Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2007 00:39:19 -0400 Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: > > you have something new and interesting about ipv6? if so, did you > submit? > Given the ARIN statement, I think it's time for more discussion of v6 migration, transition, and operations issues. No, I'm not volunteering; I'm not running a v6 network. I suspect that Martin is right -- the program committee should be proactive on this topic and seek out presenters.
I would urge potential sponsors to insist that V6 is on the agenda as a condition of funding, both meeting sponsors and Beer 'N Gear. -M<
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 30)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 26)