nanog mailing list archives
Re: Content provider plans
From: "Michal Krsek" <michal () krsek cz>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:24:23 +0200
Can someone from Google or Yahoo (or any other major provider) comment on their IPv6 plans?
Few weeks ago I had interesting discussion with *unnamed* Google VIP. His answer has been: "Google engineers doesn't see need to spend money on building IPv6 infrastructure. You, as user, can motivate them by sending request supporting this idea."
So did you write your e-mail to Google techies?BTW there is probably a way to motivate users to use IPv6. If some players (and I think there are some in this list) will make some "premium" services available only over IPv6 and do it for free, this can motivate users to go forward. Yes, this costs money, but ... everything costs money.
Nice example is to stream video over IPv6 in better quality or provide IPv6 peering for better conditions than for IP.
MK
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kevin Loch (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Larry J. Blunk (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 31)
- Re: Content provider plans Michal Krsek (May 30)
- Re: Content provider plans Sean Donelan (May 30)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Adrian Chadd (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 30)