nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:55:01 -0400
Jared Mauch wrote:
Some providers (eg: www.us.ntt.net) have their sales/marketing path ipv6 enabled. Perhaps this will help self-select customers that are clued? ;)
Most European/Asian based providers/peers don't even blink when I mention turning up IPv6. Not so with most US based networks.
The upcoming nanog meeting I think will have native IPv6 connectivity (not a tunnel). It's a good time for folks to play around with it. Visit the ipv6 enabled websites from the lan. Submit a nice 10 min talk saying what you loved and what you hated about the ipv6 network.
Better yet, nanog would be a good place for folks to arrange IPv6 peering. - Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kevin Loch (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (May 28)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Larry J. Blunk (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 31)
- Re: Content provider plans Michal Krsek (May 30)
- Re: Content provider plans Sean Donelan (May 30)