nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Advertisements


From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:14:51 +0100 (BST)


I understand the problems but I think there are clear cut cases where
/48's make sense- a large scale anycast DNS provider would seem to be a
good candidate for a /48 and I would hope it would get routed. Then again
that might be the only sensible reason...

Don't give people an excuse to deagg their /32
RIPE may only give out /32's but ARIN gives out /48's so there wouldn't be 
any deaggregation in that case.

That's not what I said. If /48 are accepted by * then people with
a /32 or whatever will deagg to /48.

How much and why they deagg will vary but *hand waving argument* it'll
be a lot more pressure on routing table size than people doing PI

You get one shot at fixed prefix size filters, miss and you'll pay
forever. Which is more scarce, /32's or routing table entries.

brandon


Current thread: