nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:15:22 -1000
Does anyone have any horror stories about deploying v6?
not horror, just had to back off. small site. so public servers provide multiple and diverse services. if a hostname has a v6 address, then all services must be v6 capable because clients do not retry the A record. and, as someone pointed out earlier, hostname hacks do not work; a referring link can not choose to yield v6.foo as opposed to foo depending on the abilities of the link follower. when i have copious spare time, i will try to sort services by v6 abilities and have another go. but spare time is like spare money these days, sigh. randy
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements John Kristoff (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)