nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:08:43 -0700
On May 31, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Donald Stahl wrote:
The upside is that in the block you're expected to accept /48s, nobody will have a /32. The downside is that anyone who gets a larger-than-minimum sized allocation/assignment can deaggregate down to that level.I don't think ARIN is planning on giving out more less a /48 but more than a /32- at least that was the impression I got. End sites get a /48- ISP's get a /32 or larger- and that's it (I could certainly be wrong). As such, deaggragation in the /48 block should not be an issue because no one will have more than a /48 in the first place.-Don
Yes, you can get a prefix between /32 and /48 if you can justify it. That is certainly
in line with the policy which resulted from proposal 2005-1. Owen
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Azinger, Marla (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Owen DeLong (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeff Kell (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Valdis . Kletnieks (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)