nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:43:39 -0400
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:38:56 -0000, bmanning () karoshi com said:
if you can get concensus to remove .com, i'm sure the roots would be willing to help out.
Whose bright idea *was* it to design a tree-hierarchical structure, and then dump essentially all 140 million entries under the same node, anyhow? :) I'll bet a large pizza that 90% or more could be relocated to a more appropriate location in the DNS tree, and nobody except the domain holder and less than a dozen other people will notice/care in the slightest. Now if anybody has a good idea on what to do with those companies that register www.thissummersblockbustermoviecomingsoonnow.com ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures bmanning (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon (May 21)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Joe Provo (May 22)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Will Hargrave (May 25)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 25)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Tim Franklin (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Simon Waters (May 21)