nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 03:32:02 -0400
On Sun, 20 May 2007 22:19:30 PDT, Roger Marquis said:
Nobody's saying that the root servers are responsible, only that they are the point at which these domains would have to be squelched. In theory registrars could do this, but some would have a financial incentive not to.
Some have a financial incentive not to do it. Some others have no financial incentive to do it. Almost none have a financial incentive to do it. Nobody should be surprised at the outcome....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures bmanning (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon (May 21)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Joe Provo (May 22)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Will Hargrave (May 25)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 25)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 20)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 20)