nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: Patrick Muldoon <doon () inoc net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:39:42 -0400
On May 10, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
If you are doing PPPOE over another carrier's ATM network, are you really a "facilities-based" provider? Or is the CALEA compliance the responsibility of the underlying ATM network provider to give LEA access to the ATM VC of the subscriber under surviellance?
Good question. In our case, we are owned by LECS, so we are facilities based, and the trade off is doing the intercept at the OC- X level or at the router.
-Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon) Key ID: 0x370D752C Press [ESC] to detonate or any other key to explode.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David E. Smith (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jeff Shultz (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Daniel Senie (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David E. Smith (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jon Lewis (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)