nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: "David E. Smith" <dave () mvn net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:36:38 -0500
Nikos Mouat wrote:
I have interpretted CALEA to apply only to providers of VOICE service, be it VOIP or traditional, however I was told this morning point blank by the FCC that CALEA most definitely applies to all ISPs that provide internet access at speeds over 200k.
That, and the definition of ISP, are still a bit fuzzy... wireless () wispa org, for instance, has had a LOT of chatter about that, but WISPA's staff attorney believes that small wireless ISPs are required to be CALEA-compliant. (WISPA is a trade association for wireless ISPs.) If small ISPs have to be compliant, it's probably safe to assume big ISPs are too. :) http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ is the list archive - there's a lot of noise in there, but a fair amount of signal (start in February 2007 or so, and work your way up). There's also forms you're apparently supposed to fill out (FCC Form 445, and a CALEA compliance plan due next week). As always your friendly attorney knows better than I do. David Smith MVN.net
Current thread:
- ISP CALEA compliance Nikos Mouat (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David E. Smith (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jeff Shultz (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Daniel Senie (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)