nanog mailing list archives

Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?)


From: "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:40:32 -0800


On Dec 19, 2007 5:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote:

"new" as in "We already have one, but we actually didn't really know
what we where requesting, now we need more"

We got our current block in 2000 (or earlier, I don't know for sure, but
2000 at the latest). So yes, we didn't know what we were doing back then.
Then again, I'd say nobody knew back then.


I'd say it's fair to bet that quite a few folks in all regions pursued
ipv6 allocations more than 3-5 years ago when the policy was
essentially '/32 per provider, simply show a business plan for
providing services to 200+ customers in the next N years' (without
much in the way of planning or proof-of-planning).

That is exactly what it is for. Then again, if you actually had
*PLANNED* your address space like you are supposed to when you make a
request you could have already calculated how much address space you
really needed and then justify it to the $RIR. In case you have to go
back to ask the $RIR for more you already made a mistake while doing the
initial request...

The world tends to change in 7 years. You seem to like bashing people for
not knowing future policy and changes 7 year ahead of time, which I think
it quite sad.

in the case of allocation policy for ipv6 things have changed
significantly in the last 2-3 years certainly. It's probably also
important to look further in the future than the current RIR policy
decision process requires. ARIN/RIPE (atleast) have a 2 year planning
horizon for LIR allocations, this isn't sufficient for ipv6 which is
supposed to last significantly longer and be as limited in
prefix/entity as possible. Some large providers are attempting to plan
5-10 years out for address policy if possible, not everyone has that
luxury, but in the end we (internet routing community) want limited
prefixes/org that means planning horizons have to be adjusted up from
2yrs to <something else>.

-Chris


Current thread: