nanog mailing list archives
Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?)
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:34:46 +0100
Leo Vegoda wrote:
On 19 Dec 2007, at 21:31, Jeroen Massar wrote: [...]When an ISP is not going to provide /48's to endusers then RIPE NCC should revoke the IPv6 prefix they received as they are not following the reasons why they received the prefix for.They received the prefix because they had a plan. That's all, a plan. Not a promise.
It is not a plan, it is justification. The 200-rule has been taken out of the allocation already. And based on the x customers times /48, they justified that they will need a /20 or something else. As such when they are going to give out /56's, they suddenly need 256 times as many customers and unless they are going to grow insanely (for a /32 from ~60k to 15m customers) they won't be able to justify their address space anymore. As such, keep it simple folks, just pass out /48's. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?, (continued)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Jared Mauch (Dec 18)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Kevin Oberman (Dec 18)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 19)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Mohacsi Janos (Dec 19)
- /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 19)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Mohacsi Janos (Dec 19)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Christopher Morrow (Dec 19)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 19)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Mohacsi Janos (Dec 21)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Leo Vegoda (Dec 23)
- Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 23)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 19)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 19)
- Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all? Andy Davidson (Dec 19)
- /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Andy Davidson (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Christopher Morrow (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Jeroen Massar (Dec 19)
- Re: /48 for each and every endsite (Was: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?) Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 19)