nanog mailing list archives
Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:29:15 -0400
Randy Bush wrote:
- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '<draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt> as an Informational RFCand what is good or bad about this representation? seems simple to me. and having one notation seems reasonable. what am i missing?
Using '.' as a delimiter will be somewhat annoying when used in regular expressions and likely to induce errors. Would '-' be a better choice? - Kevin
Current thread:
- that 4byte ASN you were considering... bmanning (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Neil J. McRae (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Joe Abley (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael Shields (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... william(at)elan.net (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Henk Uijterwaal (Oct 10)