nanog mailing list archives

Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...


From: Michael Shields <shields () msrl com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:23:54 +0000


On 2006-10-10 13:41:42, David W. Hankins wrote:
It is weird, to me, that people who have concerns about their
router's configuration syntax expect to be able to take this up
with the IETF, rather than their router manufacturer.

Personally, I care less about which notation we choose to express
four-byte ASNs than that *everyone choose one notation*.  Choosing a
mediocre notation and using it consistently would be better than having
to live forever with multiple notations.  Operating a heterogenous
network is hard enough already.

As to whether this is within the scope of the IETF, note that they are
already going far, far beyond this in the Netconf WG, which is defining
a complete router configuration protocol.
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/netconf-charter.html
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netconf-prot-12.txt
-- 
Shields.


Current thread: