nanog mailing list archives
Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:08:32 -0500
- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers ' <draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt> as an Informational RFC
and what is good or bad about this representation? seems simple to me. and having one notation seems reasonable. what am i missing?
randy
Current thread:
- that 4byte ASN you were considering... bmanning (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Neil J. McRae (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Joe Abley (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael Shields (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... william(at)elan.net (Oct 10)