nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:03:17 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Alexander Koch wrote:
ehm, when you have filter lists, why max-prefix? do you really use filters, if so what kind of? i would be really curious to know what other ISPs do.
Security in depth is actually a very good concept.You never know when someone messes up the route-map and all of a sudden you have a lot of routes in your network with high local pref (if you do that towards customers).
Having both max-prefix and route-map and prefix-list makes for good engineering over time.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Ricardo V. Oliveira (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Joe Abley (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Daniele Arena (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Niels Bakker (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jeff Aitken (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Scott Weeks (Nov 19)