nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:18:04 -0800
--- rveloso () cs ucla edu wrote: I was wondering what's the common practice among ISPs regarding the "neighbor maximum-prefix" option in Cisco and Juniper routers? By default this option is disabled in both Cisco and Juniper boxes, but was wondering if anyone in this list already configured it? I use it facing full-route upstreams (250k at present) and IXs (~50% more than I expect there) where I want to receive all routes announced without having to change route filters every time there's a change and, so, don't want a route filter. It's not necessary on customer facing interfaces as you use a route filter and only allow what's agreed on. scott
Current thread:
- "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Ricardo V. Oliveira (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Joe Abley (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Daniele Arena (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Niels Bakker (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jeff Aitken (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Scott Weeks (Nov 19)