nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be, in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90% deployment.
OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all Windows XP boxes....
- kurtis -
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne), (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Marshall Eubanks (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Tony Li (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) David Barak (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- absense of multicast deployment Joe Abley (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Marshall Eubanks (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment John Kristoff (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Edward B. DREGER (Mar 03)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Christian Kuhtz (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Per Heldal (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Joe Abley (Mar 01)
- Shim6 vs PI addressing David Barak (Mar 01)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jeroen Massar (Mar 01)