Re: absense of multicast deployment

["Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>]

JA> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:42:25 -0500
JA> From: Joe Abley

JA> If there's such a compelling need for native multicast, why has it
JA> seen such limited deployment, and why is it available to such a tiny
JA> proportion of the Internet?

One could ask the same of long-prefix PI availability and announcement.  
Lack of demand is not the only answer; one must also examine technical 
and policy constraints.

Taking your statement a step further, though, you have a very good 
point:  A smart approach is to analyze end-user wishes and demands, 
transform the "wish list" into engineering requirements, and take it 
from there.  (e.g., just what is the global table asymptotic limit?)


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.