nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN at risk
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:58:09 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:
Interesting timing, indeed, considering the UK is beginning (again?) to examine alternatives -- and Nominet playing a role there, too: http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1812343,00.html
So, with ICANN 'now' starting to forge alliances and make partnerships, despite some possibly bad moves early on, and despite some overly heavy handedness on the USGov's part over the years. Is 'no more ICANN' really a good move? Jay seems to make a good point, the devil you know vs the 'new' devil :( Would some/all of the ICANN situation been different had the USGov't just walked away one day one?
-- Tony Finch <dot () dotat at> wrote: The timing is interesting, given that DENIC and Nominet have recently come to an agreement of sorts with ICANN.
Current thread:
- ICANN at risk Jeremy Kister (Jul 03)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Tony Finch (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jul 23)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICANN at risk Fergie (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)