nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN at risk
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 7/4/06, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:note the notes already sent in: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/dnstransition.html note the multiple copies of email-only carbon-copy submissions? :( Not that I happen to disagree very much with the carbon copies, but it seems a little obviously a copy/paste job :(Milton Mueller was encouraging people to astroturf the NTIA and they're doing it. http://www.circleid.com/posts/send_a_message_to_ntia/ Sad that moveon.org style "tactics" like this should be used to make what is otherwise fairly sane and reasoned commentary.
one man's thoughts spewed by the multitudes :( I do hope that, again despite the fact that I support a 'not us govt agency incharge' and the closest we have is ICANN (despite it having some warts), the DOC/NTIA spends some time reviewing the results and does something sane with the mass-entries such as these. -Chris
Current thread:
- ICANN at risk Jeremy Kister (Jul 03)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Tony Finch (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jul 23)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICANN at risk Fergie (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)