nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN at risk
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:35:21 +0530
On 7/4/06, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:
one man's thoughts spewed by the multitudes :( I do hope that, again despite the fact that I support a 'not us govt agency incharge' and the closest we have is ICANN (despite it having some warts), the DOC/NTIA spends some time reviewing the results and does something sane with the mass-entries such as these.
People on both sides of the political spectrum have been playing silly buggers with boilerplate email for the last several years now. And with boilerplate letters and faxes for decades before that. Anyway the side with the highest paid lobbyists, or the ear of the most senators wins. So who cares? :) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- ICANN at risk Jeremy Kister (Jul 03)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Tony Finch (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jul 23)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICANN at risk Fergie (Jul 04)
- Re: ICANN at risk Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 04)