nanog mailing list archives
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:07:10 +0000
Wouldn't a well-operated network of IRRs used by 95% of network operators be able to meet all three of your requirements?Maybe I missed something, but didn't Verio say the prefix was in their internal registry, and that's why it was accepted. IOW: It didn't solve this problem. So I guess we're discussing the other 5%?
You missed the words "well-operated". Today there is no well-operated network of IRRs so there is bad data in the databases. In addition, there is the question of how to use the IRR data. Should you build filters from it? Should you use it to validate your own internal database with human beings chasing up the differences and fixing whichever database is wrong? --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?, (continued)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 30)
- MPLS vs PTP Andrew Staples (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Jon Lewis (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael . Dillon (Jan 31)
- RE: MPLS vs PTP Neil J. McRae (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael Loftis (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP John Curran (Jan 31)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Joe Abley (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Todd Underwood (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 28)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Todd Underwood (Jan 27)