nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS vs PTP
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 04:40:17 -0700
--On January 31, 2006 9:56:46 AM +0000 Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
it seems to me that a correctly configured, directly connected pipe would work as well as mpls, with the benefit of local control of myroutersand owning any incompetence.I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone...
No no, that's just the vendor koolaide machine running momentarily dry. Hold on a moment, I'm sure someone will refill it shortly with the buzzwordblend ;)
Current thread:
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?, (continued)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? bmanning (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Stephen Sprunk (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 30)
- MPLS vs PTP Andrew Staples (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Jon Lewis (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael . Dillon (Jan 31)
- RE: MPLS vs PTP Neil J. McRae (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael Loftis (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP John Curran (Jan 31)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Joe Abley (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Todd Underwood (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 28)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)