Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)

["John A. Kilpatrick" <john () hypergeek net>]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:

> Stop.  Examine.  Think.  Then respond.

[...]

> Coop ASNs/IP save ASNs and aggregate routes.  Full stop.

Maybe I missed it, but is there something in your solution that keeps 
dual-homed leaves from having to renumber when changing ISPs?  In your 
concept, is there some "ownership" of the address space on the part of the 
customer?  I know that being able to swing to a new provider (due one of a 
hundred reasons, including Layer 8 manangement decisions) without having 
to renumber or suffer significant downtime is one of the things that makes 
dual-homing appealing.

--
                               John A. Kilpatrick
john () hypergeek net                Email|     http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-page () hypergeek net      Text pages|          ICQ: 19147504
                 remember:  no obstacles/only challenges