nanog mailing list archives
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:24:25 +0000
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Mike Leber wrote:
While there are not as many businesses and organizations as people on the planet, as an exercise imagine 4 billion prefixes.
At the moment mobile IP is not implemented using the global routing infrastructure, because it can't scale to 4 billion prefixes. But if it *could* scale that well, mobile IP would be much simpler. One prefix per device. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...), (continued)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Chip Mefford (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) John A. Kilpatrick (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Joe Provo (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Mike Leber (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Tony Finch (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Michael . Dillon (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Fred Baker (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Michael . Dillon (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Vince Fuller (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) william(at)elan.net (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) James R. Cutler (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 23)
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Matthew Kaufman (Feb 15)