nanog mailing list archives
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:20:21 +0100
Edward B. DREGER wrote:
PJ> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:33 +0000 (GMT) PJ> From: Paul Jakma PJ> Well you don't need to assign an ASN for Cox and SBC to announce a shared PJ> prefix for a start off.Technically true, but administratively not feasible. Coordinating private ASNs would be similar to coordining RFC1918 space between different entities, although it's definitely a nice goal.
I'd say you already fail at coordinating Cox and SBC before any link is up and prefixes get announced. I bet they can't even agree on which of them writes the prefix and ASN application to ARIN. $realworld always wins. -- Andre
Current thread:
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...), (continued)
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Ejay Hire (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) John Payne (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Marshall Eubanks (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Chip Mefford (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) John A. Kilpatrick (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Joe Provo (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Mike Leber (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 16)