nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question for the List Maintaners -- (Re: SORBS Contact)
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:03:52 +1000
Steve Sobol wrote:
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
<replied off list>
Something to consider before replying: is this on or off topic for NANOG? (personally I think part of this is on topic, other parts of the thread are definitely off topic)It has been agreed that spam is offtopic, although the issue of hijacked netblocks certainly isn't. So I probably should have replied to you off-list (apologies to everyone else for lowering the S:N ratio). I don't know what the official word is on whether DNSBL operations in general are on-topic for this list. I would appreciate if the people in charge of deciding such things could tell me whether DNSBLs are on-topic or not...
List maintainers, would you please rule on whether: 1/ DNSbl operations are on or off topic.2/ Hijacked netblocks are on/off topic (I suspect on topic, but would like to see an official word).
Regards, Mat
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS Contact, (continued)
- Re: SORBS Contact S. Ryan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Hank Nussbacher (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact S. Ryan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Aug 09)
- RE: SORBS Contact andrew2 (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact S. Ryan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Question for the List Maintaners -- (Re: SORBS Contact) Steve Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: Question for the List Maintaners -- (Re: SORBS Contact) Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact william(at)elan.net (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Albert Meyer (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Andrew D Kirch (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Michael Nicks (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)