nanog mailing list archives
Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP
From: sigma () smx pair com
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 08:27:23 -0400 (EDT)
No, what will happen more and more is that parties who forward email will have to make a "best effort" to ensure that it is not spam. Meaning a policy "unfiltered email does not get fowarded to external parties"
This was my point. Have we already come to the day where regular e-mail forwarding is no longer workable? If so, we'll adapt, naturally, but I didn't think that day had come yet. And I didn't think Bellsouth would be leading the way.
This is a problem. Headers would go a long way to disabling the forwarding instances and/or mandating strict filtering for those customers. That being said, assuming you have told bellsouth you were working on eliminating raw forwarding they should have worked immediately to lift the block and give you the benefit of the doubt.
Bellsouth hasn't even said they want forwarding eliminated or filtered; they are just being obstinate and unhelpful. Kevin
Current thread:
- Requst for tech/peering contact to Qwest, Bresnan/ATT Worldnet(?) (for Montana) Michael Loftis (Sep 19)
- 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Alan Spicer (Sep 19)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 19)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Alan Spicer (Sep 20)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 20)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Dan Hollis (Sep 20)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Omar Thameen (Sep 24)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Alan Spicer (Sep 24)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP sigma (Sep 24)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Joe Maimon (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP sigma (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Sean Figgins (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP jc dill (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 25)
- Why is it necessary to "tag" on-topic news cites? jc dill (Sep 26)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Gadi Evron (Sep 26)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP James Spenceley (Sep 26)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 19)
- 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Alan Spicer (Sep 19)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Michael Loftis (Sep 25)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 25)