nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:31:25 -0400
On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:13 PM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
Most transit contracts only guarantee packet delivery to the edge of their own networks. I'm pretty sure Cogent is doing that. (Hell, they have lots of spare capacity now. :)Most also have a clause to cover the inter-AS links, making sure that they are not overloaded.
Really? You must have different transit contracts that I do. (But I bet I have more than you do.)
I think the word "most" is probably an overstatement. I'd be surprised if more than a "few" did.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering jmalcolm (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Randy Bush (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Dave Stewart (Oct 05)
- Cogent/Level 3 drama, why it's the best news of the day! Peter Kranz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Barak (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jon Lewis (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Christopher Woodfield (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Sinn (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Oct 05)
- (de)peering bmanning (Oct 05)
- Re: (de)peering Pekka Savola (Oct 05)
- Re: (de)peering Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 06)