nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:36 +0100
there is no hope in having operators explain to ietf that the current
path
is fruitless? certainly they can be made to see the light, yes?you have not spent much time with the ivtf, have you?
In case you have never heard of the IVTF, Randy eloquently summarizes it here: https://rip.psg.com/~randy/050721.ccr-ivtf.html --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephane Bortzmeyer (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Simon Lyall (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Per Heldal (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Susan Harris (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Mark Smith (Oct 16)