nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 news


From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 16 Oct 2005 04:08:26 +0000


drc () virtualized org (David Conrad) writes:

On Oct 15, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Tony Li wrote:
When we explored site multihoming (not rehoming) in the ways that  
you seem to suggest, it was effectively a set of coordinated NAT  
boxes around the periphery of the site.  That was rejected quite  
quickly.

What were the reasons for rejection?

i wasn't there for that meeting.  but when similar things were proposed
at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to-end,
and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."
-- 
Paul Vixie


Current thread: